
I spotted a
story in the Telegraph about the change in what university means to young people since their parents were there (or not as the case my be).
The author talks about the end of the golden age a decade ago (1998 to be exact), when fees were brought into the equation; before then students were seen to be tax dodging, middle class, layabouts. Of course students are still seen as tax dodging, middle class, layabouts, but does anyone know why?
There are more students from working class and disadvantaged backgrounds then ever before as
some universities are falling over themselves to increase widening participation; however the stereotype still remains. The problem is the self styled
top universities of the Russell Group are less worried about attracting students from non-traditional backgrounds, whilst many new universities are genuinely trying to attract these students.
It is said that university, or moving away from home in general, is a right of passage for young people. For many they won't have cooked a proper meal without parental supervision, or thought about setting a budget; but even though students have had precious little support since the introduction of fees, there are people who don't understand the changing face of students.
In the comments to that Telegraph article, I found this;
At most universities students do not live in the cities year round, but for terms. At the end of terms you see numerous middle-class parents picking up their kids to take them home for the breaks. This is not really independence is it.
Now I went home at Christmas and Easter, but I got myself home and if I wanted to stay in my student digs then I did so. That's pretty independent if you ask me. More and more students are staying in their student accommodation outside of term time, find summer jobs or take more hours at the job they do during term time anyway.
A further comment said this;
They often only learn how to get drunk, skive and chat up the opposite sex and never learn to cope as adults, get up on time, do homework, that sort of thing. Many of them are so badly prepared that they cannot study or write essays. Many have to have remedial education just to cope.
The person who left this comment goes on to support the staying at home student. I would be interested to know how this would help them cope as adults, or even get up on time (assuming both parents are working).
Do these people even remember what it was like to be young, or do they resent that students look to be having a better time than they did. What is clear is they haven't moved on from that old stereotypical student. If they went to any of the new universities, then they'd be shocked over the amount of working class students there were.
Students are now more prepared for the real world than ever before. After all, mummy and daddy can no longer afford for them not to be!
JR